Integrity/ Corruption
Net—
1 member · 0 pooled assessments
Requires at least two scored assessments per six-hour cycle for both this profile and the comparison field.
Requires at least two scored assessments per six-hour cycle for both this profile and the comparison field.
Awaiting scored assessments
Awaiting scored assessments
Computed live from 0 assessments in the selected period. Strength marks are positive and weakness marks are negative.
Strengths = mean strength marks +p (0–5) · Weaknesses = mean weakness marks −n (0–5) · Net = strengths − weaknesses · bars scale to 5 marks.
Score trends and derived indicators computed live from People's Renaissance Movement’s assessments in the selected period.
Relative index · Y-axis 0–100
Average true range of individual daily assessment scores; larger values mean more disagreement or movement.
True range = max(high − low, |high − previous close|, |low − previous close|); ATR is its period mean.
The candidate’s mean strength marks minus mean weakness marks across all ten pairs.
Balance = mean strength marks − mean weakness marks; range −5 to +5 per attribute.
Closest assessed profile: Patricia Kagendo.
Similarity = 100 × (1 − Euclidean distance between ten attribute-net means / maximum distance).
Field mean net sentiment: 0.00.
Field gap = profile net sentiment − mean net sentiment of comparison profiles.
Dated mean net, strength, and weakness marks from real scorecard votes.
Each period groups phone-verified assessments by UTC calendar day.
| Date | X̄ (net) | P̄ (strength) | N̄ (weakness) | Assessments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-22 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-23 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-24 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-25 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-26 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-27 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
| 2026-10-28 | 0.0 | +0.0 | −0.0 | 0 |
Woman Representative candidates